El Programa de Agricultura Urbana de la Municipalidad de Rosario en Argentina
Lattuca A.L., Terrile R.H., Sadagorsky C.
Hábitat y Sociedad
Urban Farm DB summary
Documents Rosario's municipal Urban Agriculture Programme (PAU), launched in 2002, which grew to over 800 community farming projects on vacant land to address food insecurity and generate income for marginalized residents, with 65% of participants being women.
Extracted facts
8 factsOnly numbers and their conditions are stored, as structured data — never the source's own sentences. Metric and condition names stay in English, as coded.
- 67 ha
recovered land area(urban agriculture land rosario)
Design- region
- Rosario, Argentina
- year
- 2014
- method
- "actualmente integran el PAU 67 hectáreas de suelo urbano recuperadas y preservadas"
- 250 people
active participants(urban gardeners rosario)
Social- region
- Rosario, Argentina
- year
- 2014
- method
- "250 huerter@s produciendo con técnicas limpias sin contaminantes"
- 95,000 kg
annual yield(vegetable production rosario)
Yield- region
- Rosario, Argentina
- year
- 2014
- method
- "se estima la producción anual en 95.000 kilos de verduras... libres de agrotóxicos"
- 19 ha
socio productive area(urban agriculture land rosario)
Design- region
- Rosario, Argentina
- year
- 2014
- method
- of the 67 ha total, 19 ha are socio-productive space and 48 ha are for recreation/sport
- 140 people
active participants(youth gardeners rosario)
Social- region
- Rosario, Argentina
- year
- 2014
- 400 people
regular consumers(farmers market consumers rosario)
Economics- region
- Rosario, Argentina
- year
- 2014
- 5,000 kg
annual yield(aromatic herb production rosario)
Yield- region
- Rosario, Argentina
- year
- 2014
- 240 people
active members(seed network rosario)
Biodiversity- region
- Rosario, Argentina
- year
- 2014
- method
- "Red de Madrinas y Padrinos de las Semillas... integrada por 240 miembros activos"
Direction of conclusions
Each author conclusion is recorded only as a coded direction per topic. Read the original for the conclusion itself.
- Food securitySupports
- Land tenureSupports
- Economic viabilitySupports