Urban Farm DB
Research catalogue
Database research record2023·Global

Potential Policy and Community Implications of Equitable Organic Waste, Compost, and Urban Agricultural Systems in the United States

Hall S.M., Tikku V., Heiger-Bernays W.J.

Environmental Health Perspectives, 131(11):115001

Urban Farm DB summary

Examines equity and safety in urban organic-waste cycling through a case study of waste-to-compost activities and legislation in four US cities. It warns that contaminants such as pesticides, lead, and PFAS and inconsistent regulation can worsen racial inequities in access to urban farmland and safe compost, and recommends justice-oriented policy with multilingual education and proper waste disposal.

Key points

  • 1Compost produced from urban organic waste often contains contaminants harmful to human and environmental health.
  • 2Finished, tested compost is typically unavailable to those contributing the waste and whose gardens would benefit.
  • 3The engagement of intersectional partners in the creation of equitable policies and contracts that integrate food and waste justice is crucial to safer compost production.
  • 4Strict feedstock regulation and required compost safety testing are essential to produce safe, city-sourced compost.
  • 5Balancing the needs of landfill diversion with equitable distribution to all contributors, particularly low-income and food-insecure people, will help concentrate urban agriculture benefits within marginalized communities.
  • 6Adoption of a public health lens may help ensure the safety of nutrient-rich compost available for urban growers through legislation at state and local levels, along with explicit industry contracts.

Abstract and stored text

OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Urban organic waste diverted from landfills for use as compost feedstock may help mitigate and adapt to the effects of our changing climate. Yet, compost produced from urban food and yard waste is often a source of contaminants harmful to human and environmental health. Efforts by multiple municipalities are increasing residential and commercial food and yard waste collection; however, finished, tested compost is typically unavailable to those contributing the waste and whose gardens would benefit. OBJECTIVES: ) provide recommendations to promote safer compost production from urban organic waste inputs. The engagement of intersectional partners in the creation of equitable policies and contracts that integrate food and waste justice is crucial to this work. METHODS: A 15-y relationship between community, academic, and government partners in Boston, Massachusetts, has increased access to health-promoting community gardens. Historical concerns raised by gardeners resulted in improvement to the quality of compost sourced from municipal organic waste and motivated a case study of Boston and three other cities (Seattle, Washington; San Francisco, California; New York, New York). This case study provides the approaches used to source, collect, process, test, and deliver urban organic waste as compost for UA. It informed recommendations to improve the safety and equity of organic waste-to-compost cycles. DISCUSSION: Strict feedstock regulation and required compost safety testing are essential to produce safe, city-sourced compost. Balancing the needs of landfill diversion with equitable distribution to all contributors, particularly low-income and food-insecure people, will help concentrate UA benefits within marginalized communities. Adoption of a public health lens may help ensure the safety of nutrient-rich compost available for urban growers through legislation at state and local levels, along with explicit industry contracts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12921.

Why it matters for urban farming

This paper directly addresses critical issues for citizen-driven urban farming. It highlights that while urban organic waste can be a valuable resource for compost, ensuring its safety from contaminants like pesticides, lead, and PFAS is paramount. For urban farmers, especially those in marginalized communities, access to safe, tested compost is often limited despite their contributions to waste collection. This research emphasizes the need for policies that prioritize equitable distribution of high-quality compost, strict regulation of feedstock, and mandatory safety testing. It calls for a public health approach to ensure that the benefits of nutrient-rich compost reach all urban growers, promoting both environmental sustainability and social justice in urban food systems.