Why Full Cost Recovery Matters
Plinth
Plinth
Urban Farm DB summary
Published 5 April 2026 and updated 14 June 2026. Full cost recovery means funders covering not only a project's direct costs but its proportional share of overheads — rent, finance, IT, HR and chief-executive time. The article works through an example where two of ten staff (20 per cent of capacity) deliver a project, so £28,000 of £140,000 in annual overheads is added to £85,000 of direct costs for a £113,000 budget, and notes that overhead rates of 15–25 per cent are common sector guidance. It argues that accepting grants below true cost is a structural funding problem rather than a budgeting error, with consequences including staff burnout and governance risk, and notes that charity staff earn roughly 7 per cent less per hour than equivalent roles elsewhere in the economy.
Extracted facts
2 factsOnly numbers and their conditions are stored, as structured data — never the source's own sentences. Metric and condition names stay in English, as coded.
- 15–25 %
overhead rate(charity overheads)
Economics- region
- United Kingdom
- year
- 2026
- method
- overhead rates described on the page as common sector guidance
- -7 %↓ Decrease
hourly pay gap(charity pay)
EconomicsControl: equivalent roles elsewhere in the economy- region
- United Kingdom
- year
- 2026
- method
- hourly pay of charity staff compared with equivalent roles
Direction of conclusions
Each author conclusion is recorded only as a coded direction per topic. Read the original for the conclusion itself.
- Economic viabilityContradictsWith caveats
Columns citing this source
This source is cited by the columns below. This page records the connection before you continue to the external source.