Health Benefits of Urban Allotment Gardening: Improved Physical and Psychological Well-Being and Social Integration
Soga M., Cox D.T.C., Yamaura Y., Gaston K.J., Kurisu K., Hanaki K.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(1):71
Urban Farm DB summary
A questionnaire survey of 332 allotment gardeners and non-gardeners in Tokyo compared five self-reported outcomes: perceived general health, physical complaints, BMI, mental health and social cohesion. Allotment gardeners reported better general health, fewer complaints, better mental health and greater social cohesion, indicating that urban allotment gardening can improve residents' physical and mental health and community ties.
Key points
- 1Allotment gardeners reported better perceived general health, fewer subjective health complaints, better mental health, and greater social cohesion compared to non-gardeners.
- 2Body Mass Index (BMI) did not differ significantly between allotment gardeners and non-gardeners.
- 3Neither the frequency nor the duration of gardening significantly influenced the reported health outcomes.
- 4Regular gardening on allotment sites is associated with improved physical, psychological, and social health.
Extracted facts
7 factsOnly numbers and their conditions are stored, as structured data — never the source's own sentences. Metric and condition names stay in English, as coded.
- 332
survey respondent count(allotment gardener)
Healthn = 332- region
- JP-13
- setting
- urban
- study design
- questionnaire-survey
- better than non gardeners↑ Increase
perceived general health(allotment gardener)
Healthn = 332Control: non-gardener controls- region
- JP-13
- setting
- urban
- study design
- regression-adjusted-for-sociodemographic-and-lifestyle
- better than non gardeners↑ Increase
subjective health complaints(allotment gardener)
Healthn = 332Control: non-gardener controls- region
- JP-13
- setting
- urban
- study design
- regression-adjusted-for-sociodemographic-and-lifestyle
- better than non gardeners↑ Increase
mental health(allotment gardener)
Healthn = 332Control: non-gardener controls- region
- JP-13
- setting
- urban
- study design
- regression-adjusted-for-sociodemographic-and-lifestyle
- better than non gardeners↑ Increase
social cohesion(allotment gardener)
Socialn = 332Control: non-gardener controls- region
- JP-13
- setting
- urban
- study design
- regression-adjusted-for-sociodemographic-and-lifestyle
- no difference vs non gardeners→ No change
body mass index(allotment gardener)
Healthn = 332Control: non-gardener controls- region
- JP-13
- setting
- urban
- study design
- questionnaire-survey
- no significant influence→ No changeNot significant
effect of gardening frequency and duration(allotment gardener)
Healthn = 332- region
- JP-13
- setting
- urban
- outcome
- self-reported-health-outcomes
Direction of conclusions
Each author conclusion is recorded only as a coded direction per topic. Read the original for the conclusion itself.
- Mental healthSupportsWith caveats
- Community cohesionSupportsWith caveats
- Nutrition and healthMixedWith caveats
Abstract and stored text
OpenAlexWith an ever-increasing urban population, promoting public health and well-being in towns and cities is a major challenge. Previous research has suggested that participating in allotment gardening delivers a wide range of health benefits. However, evidence from quantitative analyses is still scarce. Here, we quantify the effects, if any, of participating in allotment gardening on physical, psychological and social health. A questionnaire survey of 332 people was performed in Tokyo, Japan. We compared five self-reported health outcomes between allotment gardeners and non-gardener controls: perceived general health, subjective health complaints, body mass index (BMI), mental health and social cohesion. Accounting for socio-demographic and lifestyle variables, regression models revealed that allotment gardeners, compared to non-gardeners, reported better perceived general health, subjective health complaints, mental health and social cohesion. BMI did not differ between gardeners and non-gardeners. Neither frequency nor duration of gardening significantly influenced reported health outcomes. Our results highlight that regular gardening on allotment sites is associated with improved physical, psychological and social health. With the recent escalation in the prevalence of chronic diseases, and associated healthcare costs, this study has a major implication for policy, as it suggests that urban allotments have great potential for preventative healthcare.
Why it matters for urban farming
This study provides strong quantitative evidence that participating in urban allotment gardening significantly improves physical, psychological, and social well-being. For citizens involved in urban farming, this means that their efforts are not just about growing food, but also about actively contributing to their own health and building stronger community ties. It highlights urban farms as vital spaces for preventative healthcare and community building, encouraging more people to join and support these initiatives for a healthier urban life.