Urban Farm DB
Research catalogue
Database research record2021·United States

Impact of a School-Based Gardening, Cooking, Nutrition Intervention on Diet Intake and Quality: The TX Sprouts Randomized Controlled Trial

Landry M., van den Berg A., Hoelscher D., Davis J.

Nutrients, 13(9):3081 (MDPI)

Urban Farm DB summary

A randomized controlled trial across 16 mostly Hispanic, low-income elementary schools in Texas evaluating the TX Sprouts intervention, which embedded gardening, cooking and nutrition lessons. Children in intervention schools significantly increased vegetable intake, showing that garden-centered food education can improve children's dietary quality.

Key points

  • 1The TX Sprouts intervention, a one-year school-based gardening, cooking, and nutrition program, was evaluated for its effects on students' dietary intake and quality.
  • 2The intervention group showed a modest increase in protein intake (0.4% vs. -0.3%, p = 0.021) and a significant increase in total vegetable component scores (+4% vs. -2%, p = 0.003) compared to the control group.
  • 3Non-Hispanic children in the intervention group experienced a significant increase in total vegetable scores (+4% vs. -8%, p = 0.026) when stratified by ethnicity/race.
  • 4While both groups increased added sugar intake, the intervention group's increase was significantly smaller (0.3 vs. 2.6 g/day, p = 0.050).
  • 5School-based gardening, cooking, and nutrition interventions can lead to significant improvements in dietary intake.

Abstract and stored text

OpenAlex

School gardens have become common school-based health promotion strategies to enhance dietary behaviors in the United States. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of TX Sprouts, a one-year school-based gardening, cooking, and nutrition cluster randomized controlled trial, on students’ dietary intake and quality. Eight schools were randomly assigned to the TX Sprouts intervention and eight schools to control (i.e., delayed intervention) over three years (2016–2019). The intervention arm received: formation and training of Garden Leadership Committees; a 0.25-acre outdoor teaching garden; 18 student lessons including gardening, nutrition, and cooking activities, taught weekly in the teaching garden during school hours; and nine parent lessons, taught monthly. Dietary intake data via two 24 h dietary recalls (24 hDR) were collected on a random subsample (n = 468). Dietary quality was calculated using the Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015). The intervention group compared to control resulted in a modest increase in protein intake as a percentage of total energy (0.4% vs. −0.3%, p = 0.021) and in HEI-2015 total vegetables component scores (+4% vs. −2%, p = 0.003). When stratified by ethnicity/race, non-Hispanic children had a significant increase in HEI-2015 total vegetable scores in the intervention group compared to the control group (+4% vs. −8%, p = 0.026). Both the intervention and control groups increased added sugar intake; however, to a lesser extent within the intervention group (0.3 vs. 2.6 g/day, p = 0.050). School-based gardening, cooking, and nutrition interventions can result in significant improvements in dietary intake. Further research on ways to scale and sustain nutrition education programs in schools is warranted. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02668744).

Why it matters for urban farming

This study demonstrates that integrating gardening, cooking, and nutrition education into schools can significantly improve children's dietary habits, particularly increasing vegetable intake and moderating added sugar consumption. For urban farmers, this highlights the potential of school gardens as powerful community hubs for health promotion and food education. Citizen-driven urban farms can partner with local schools to establish or support such programs, fostering healthier eating from a young age and building a more food-literate community. It underscores the value of hands-on experience in cultivating food as a tool for public health.