Walking Migge's gardens — what became of the plots at Britz, Römerstadt and Törten a hundred years on
The thinking was covered in an earlier column; today the subject is area, dates and present condition
2026-09-04 · 18 min read
Series · How Germany became a country of gardens — 150 years of law, associations and foundations3 / 7

On 26 July 2026, at its 48th session in Busan, South Korea, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee inscribed Berlin's Waldsiedlung Zehlendorf as the seventh component of the World Heritage site 'Housing Estates in the Berlin Modern Style'. The open space of that estate, built between 1926 and 1932, was designed by the landscape architect Leberecht Migge together with Martha Willings-Göhre. A century after its foundation stone was laid, another estate whose gardens Migge drew has become World Heritage. This article covers neither Migge's life nor his thought; that was the subject of an earlier column, Hitler and Migge: subsistence gardens in the age of 'Blood and Soil'. What it looks at is land. The Horseshoe Estate in Berlin-Britz, Römerstadt in Frankfurt, and Ziebigk and Törten in Dessau. Of the subsistence plots drawn alongside the houses in the 1920s, how many square metres survive a hundred years later, who owns them, which instrument protects them, and where did they turn into extensions and garages? Areas, dates and present condition, and nothing else.
This article in 3 minutes
- On 26 July 2026 the 48th World Heritage Committee session in Busan added Waldsiedlung Zehlendorf as the seventh component of the Berlin Modernism Housing Estates. Migge and Martha Willings-Göhre designed the open space of its 1,917 dwellings.
- The Horseshoe Estate in Britz was built between 1925 and 1930; of its 1,963 dwellings, 679 are row houses with gardens. It became World Heritage in 2008 and a listed garden monument in Berlin in 2010.
- At Römerstadt the plots are themselves the protected heritage: the Hessian monument register names the perpetual-lease gardens below the southern terraces, and the allotments including their sheds, inside the protected ensemble.
- The Bauhaus's own estate at Dessau-Törten put up 314 row houses in 1926–28, each 57–75 m² of dwelling against 350–400 m² of garden. Residents built extensions and garages on those plots, the uniform appearance was lost, and the 1994 conservation ordinance protects the elevations.
- Migge's Dessau gardens are not at Törten but at the Knarrberg estate in Ziebigk (1926–28, 183 houses) — and all 183 of those houses still have a working plot today.
- This article's position is not a verdict on heritage protection. It uses four sites to show one observation: what these instruments protect is the appearance of buildings, and whether a plot stays a plot is decided by something else.
Opening
The ideas were written up already; today it is only areas of land and their present condition
Leberecht Migge's life and thought were the subject of an earlier column, Hitler and Migge: subsistence gardens in the age of 'Blood and Soil' — what the Green Manifesto argued, what the productive Siedlung that designed house and plot as one unit actually was, how he imagined the city's cycle of matter, and how that vocabulary was bent toward 'Blood and Soil'. None of it is repeated here. This is not an intellectual history of Migge, nor of the Bauhaus. It is a record of the land they actually drew.
Day two, on the allotment ordinance that hunger wrote on 31 July 1919, looked at the day the machinery for protecting gardens was written into law. Today we walk the gardens that sit outside that law. The private subsistence plots that Weimar-era modernist estates attached to their houses were a different animal from allotments: not leased, not tied to club membership, simply a field that came with the house. What became of them a century on? Four sites — Berlin-Britz, Frankfurt-Römerstadt, and Ziebigk and Törten in Dessau — checked on four points: area, dates, protection, present condition.
Starting point
On 26 July 2026 another estate whose green space Migge designed became World Heritage
According to the Berlin state heritage office, on 26 July 2026 the 48th session of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, meeting in Busan, South Korea, inscribed Waldsiedlung Zehlendorf as the seventh component of the World Heritage site 'Housing Estates in the Berlin Modern Style'. The site had been inscribed in 2008 with six estates; this is its first extension in eighteen years. Waldsiedlung Zehlendorf was built between 1926 and 1932 to designs by Bruno Taut, Hugo Häring and Otto Rudolf Salvisberg — 1,917 dwellings in all, 1,108 of them flats in blocks of up to three storeys and 809 single-family houses. The open space of this estate, set among pines, was designed by Migge and Martha Willings-Göhre.
What earned the inscription is the estate as a whole, not its gardens: the continuous flat roofs, the differentiated colouring, the fit into the existing forest, the handling of traffic. The announcement does, however, name Migge as designer of the open space. So a second estate carrying his hand — after Britz in 2008 — is now part of a World Heritage site; twice in a century has the heritage system taken his work into its protection. Which raises the question of what, in substance, has been protected. From here, four sites on the ground.
Sources & further reading
- Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission — Siedlungen der Berliner Moderne
- Landesdenkmalamt Berlin — Waldsiedlung Zehlendorf ist Welterbe! (2026)
- Welterbe Siedlungen der Berliner Moderne — Hufeisensiedlung Britz (1925–30)
- Stiftung Bauhaus Dessau — Siedlung Dessau-Törten
- Wikipedia (de) — Siedlung Dessau-Törten
- DenkXweb, Landesamt für Denkmalpflege Hessen — Siedlung Römerstadt (Gesamtanlage)
- ernst-may-gesellschaft — Siedlung Römerstadt
- Deutsche Stiftung Denkmalschutz — Kleingartenanlage Römerstadt II, Frankfurt
- Deutscher Werkbund — Exkursion zur Knarrbergsiedlung Dessau-Ziebigk
- Universität Kassel, FB06 / Forschungsstelle FGÖB — Lebrecht Migge
Everything above is free to read.
The rest is for members
This column has moved into the archive, so the full deep-dive is for Urban Farm Crew members and up. Membership funds the daily collection, research and operation of this independent public database. The latest columns are free for everyone.
Or get new columns free by email first
Every Wednesday: a free email digest of new urban-farming cases, research and events from around the world.
Reader feedback
Was this article useful?
No sign-in required. One vote per article on this device; you can change your choice.
Related columns
Germany among its neighbours — what is actually different from Britain, France and Poland?
Allotments are no German monopoly. What differs is not the number of plots but the rent cap, the closed list of termination grounds and the legal standing of the association
19 min readA Munich foundation that links 1,000 gardens — anstiftung and the network of self-making
Who keeps the gardens that no law protects?
18 min read1.5 million in the East, a 1983 law in the West — the two gardens that division made
In the East an organisation kept the gardens; in the West a statute did. What unification left standing was the statute, plus a set of exemptions written for the East
18 min readA Reich league of one million — how the Nazis organised the allotment
Nuremberg, 29 July 1933: an allotment federation was replaced by a Reich league in a single day
18 min read