Urban Farm DB
Research catalogue
Database research record2016·United States

State of Evaluation 2016: Evaluation Practice and Capacity in the Nonprofit Sector

Innovation Network

Innovation Network, Inc.

Urban Farm DB summary

The 2016 edition of Innovation Network's nationwide survey of nonprofit evaluation, running since 2010, with responses from 1,125 US-based 501(c)(3) organisations. The share engaging in any evaluation in the past year reached an all-time high of 92 per cent, and the share receiving evaluation funding from at least one source rose from 66 per cent in 2012 to 92 per cent. Yet the share showing a promising mix of evaluation characteristics and practices held flat at 28 per cent, only 12 per cent of organisations spent 5 per cent or more of their budget on evaluation, and only 8 per cent had evaluation staff, internal or external — both sizeable decreases.

Extracted facts

5 facts

Only numbers and their conditions are stored, as structured data — never the source's own sentences. Metric and condition names stay in English, as coded.

  • 92 % Increase

    organisations engaged in evaluation(nonprofit evaluation)

    Socialn = 1,125Control: all-time high since the survey began in 2010
    region
    United States
    year
    2016
    method
    survey of US 501(c)(3) organisations, share evaluating in the past year
  • 28 % No change

    evaluation capacity share(nonprofit evaluation)

    Socialn = 1,125Control: 28 per cent in 2012
    region
    United States
    year
    2016
    method
    share showing a promising mix of evaluation characteristics and practices
  • 12 % Decrease

    share spending 5pct or more of budget(nonprofit evaluation)

    Economicsn = 1,125Control: sizeable decrease from the previous round
    region
    United States
    year
    2016
    method
    share of organisations spending 5 per cent or more of budget on evaluation
  • 8 % Decrease

    share with evaluation staff(nonprofit evaluation)

    Economicsn = 1,125Control: sizeable decrease from the previous round
    region
    United States
    year
    2016
    method
    share with evaluation staff, internal or external
  • 92 % Increase

    share receiving evaluation funding(nonprofit evaluation)

    Economicsn = 1,125Control: 66 per cent in 2012
    region
    United States
    year
    2016
    method
    among organisations that engaged in evaluation, share funded from at least one source

Direction of conclusions

Each author conclusion is recorded only as a coded direction per topic. Read the original for the conclusion itself.

  • Policy and governanceMixedWith caveats

Columns citing this source

This source is cited by the columns below. This page records the connection before you continue to the external source.