Three NYC Composting Failures That Reflect Troubling National Trends
Jordan Ashby, Clarissa Libertelli
Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR)
Urban Farm DB summary
Just after NYC announced expansion of mandatory residential organics collection by 2024, the mayor's office eliminated funding for the city's community composting program. The article identifies three failures reflecting national trends: government 'composting' programs that actually rely on anaerobic digestion, centralized processing that concentrates environmental burdens in vulnerable neighborhoods, and mandatory government programs undercutting community composters' viability.
Extracted facts
5 factsOnly numbers and their conditions are stored, as structured data — never the source's own sentences. Metric and condition names stay in English, as coded.
- 75 %
neighborhood share of waste(waste processing concentration)
Policy- region
- 3 NYC neighborhoods
- year
- 2018
- 200 t
daily tonnage(food scrap transfer station)
Policy- region
- Williamsburg transfer station, New York City
- year
- 2023
- 200 count↓ Decrease
customer loss count(community composter customer loss)
EconomicsControl: customers before city smart-bin rollout- region
- BK ROT, New York City
- year
- 2023
- 45,000 count
signatures(composting program cuts petition)
Social- region
- New York City
- year
- 2023
- 30 %↓ Decrease
customer loss rate(community composter customer loss)
EconomicsControl: residential customers before LA green bin program- region
- Compostable LA, Los Angeles
- year
- 2023
Direction of conclusions
Each author conclusion is recorded only as a coded direction per topic. Read the original for the conclusion itself.
- Equity / gentrificationContradicts
- Policy and governanceContradictsWith caveats
Columns citing this source
This source is cited by the columns below. This page records the connection before you continue to the external source.