Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones: Four Years In

Urban Farm DB summary

SPUR's May 2017 article reports on four years of implementation of California's Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones law (AB-551). San Francisco, Sacramento, San Jose and Santa Clara County had opted into the program, with four parcels across three cities under contract at the time; five more jurisdictions including San Diego, Los Angeles and Long Beach were considering it. The article reports the resulting loss in property tax revenue was minimal, under $7,000 per year in all but one case.

Only numbers and their conditions are stored, as structured data — never the source's own sentences. Metric and condition names stay in English, as coded.

• 4 count

  participating jurisdictions(urban agriculture incentive zone)

  Policy

  region

  California, United States

  year

  2017

  note

  San Francisco, Sacramento, San Jose, Santa Clara County

• 4 count

  parcels under contract(urban agriculture incentive zone)

  Policy

  region

  California, United States

  year

  2017

  note

  3都市にまたがる

• –7,000 usd_per_year

  annual property tax revenue loss(urban agriculture incentive zone)

  Economics

  region

  California, United States

  year

  2017

  note

  1件を除きいずれも7,000ドル未満

Direction of conclusions

Each author conclusion is recorded only as a coded direction per topic. Read the original for the conclusion itself.

• Economic viabilitySupportsWith caveats
• Policy and governanceMixedWith caveats