When was 'impact' invented? — a genealogy of the idea of social investment
The vocabulary this whole field uses is far newer than it feels
2026-08-28 · 20 min read
Series · How do you measure 'good for society'? — urban farming and social impact3 / 7

Day two looked at the tools used to measure — SROI, logic models. Today the lens shifts to history: why these tools came to seem necessary in the first place. The short answer is that the phrase 'impact investing' itself is a startlingly recent invention, coined in 2007 at a Rockefeller Foundation meeting in Bellagio, Italy. It did not, though, appear out of nowhere. In Britain, the ideas of 'social enterprise' and 'social audit' had been growing since the 1970s. In Japan, the 1998 NPO Act gave citizen activity a legal footing, and the 2016 Dormant Deposit Act built evaluation into the funding system. Today traces both lineages — the Anglo-American act of naming an investment category, and Japan's slower build-out of legal and institutional machinery — and where they meet.
This article in 3 minutes
- The phrase 'impact investing' was coined at Rockefeller Foundation meetings in Bellagio, Italy, in October 2007 and June 2008, where the definition — 'using profit-seeking investment to generate social and environmental good' — was first put into words.
- The dedicated international body, the Global Impact Investing Network, launched on 25 September 2009 at the Clinton Global Initiative in the United States, backed by the Rockefeller Foundation, JPMorgan and USAID — an organisation not yet two decades old.
- The practice predated the naming. In Britain, the cooperative movement grew after the Industrial Common Ownership Act of 1976, and by 1981 Beechwood College in Leeds had published a manual teaching 'social audit' as a tool for running an organisation.
- In Japan, the volunteer response to the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake led directly to the 1998 NPO Act, which gave citizen groups a legal footing. But 'evaluation' did not clearly surface as a policy issue until seventeen years later, in fiscal 2015.
- In that fiscal year, the Cabinet Office set up a Social Impact Evaluation Study Working Group, whose March 2016 report codified the basic concepts of evaluation. That December, the Dormant Deposit Utilization Act was enacted, building evaluation directly into the funding system.
- This article's position is not that the field's youth is itself a flaw. Only nine years separate the 2007 coinage of the term from Japan's 2016 institutionalisation of it — and this article's conclusion is that the field should be judged, and compared against others, with that youth in mind.
Opening
SROI and the logic model were both assembled hurriedly, within the last twenty years
Day two showed that the standard SROI guide was published in 2009 (updated 2012), and the logic-model chain was formalised in 2004. Those dates are not a coincidence. The very phrase 'impact investing' was coined at the Rockefeller Foundation's Bellagio meetings in 2007, and the dedicated international body built around it, the Global Impact Investing Network, launched in September 2009. Much of what is now called SROI or the logic model, in other words, was systematised at almost the same moment as that naming, or just after it. Measuring 'social impact' as a distinct activity is a comparatively recent practice, institutionalised in a hurry in the late 2000s.
That does not mean the idea of measuring the results of social activity began in 2007. In Britain, cooperatives and community businesses had been explaining their own work through 'social audit' since the 1970s. The concept of social capital, taken up in the earlier column Urban Farming and Community that this series assumes, has an even longer history in social science. Today's article shows that several older lineages have converged under the new banner of 'impact investing.'
Before the naming
From a 1976 cooperatives act to a 1981 manual on 'social audit'
The use of 'social enterprise' in something close to its current meaning is traced back to British practitioner Freer Spreckley's writing on cooperatives in the late 1970s. In that period, Britain's Industrial Common Ownership Act of 1976 established a legal definition of 'common ownership,' and many cooperatives registered under it through ICOM, the Industrial Common Ownership Movement. In 1979, as part of a social-democratic alternative movement under the Thatcher government, the community-business movement launched a magazine called New Sector.
Within that current, Beechwood College in Leeds published, in 1981, a booklet titled the Social Audit Toolkit: A Management Tool for Cooperative Working. It reportedly sold around 2,000 copies — a practical manual that arrived nearly two decades ahead of the UK's dedicated policy push for social enterprise around 2000. What matters here is that the idea of measuring predates GIIN by a long way; it was something cooperatives on the ground worked out for themselves, to meet their own accountability. What the Rockefeller Foundation's Bellagio meetings did was plant a single flag, 'impact investing,' over that scattered practice, and pull in a new kind of funder: institutional investors.
Sources & further reading
- Rockefeller Foundation — Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN), from the Bellagio archives
- Wikipedia — Global Impact Investing Network
- Emerald Insight — Solidarity cooperatives: The (hidden) origins of communitarian pluralism in the UK social enterprise movement, Social Enterprise Journal 15(2)
- Nobel Prize — Grameen Bank and Muhammad Yunus, facts
- 内閣府NPOホームページ — 特定非営利活動促進法のこれまで(法制定の経緯)
- 衆議院 — 民間公益活動を促進するための休眠預金等に係る資金の活用に関する法律(法律第百一号)
- 内閣府 — JANPIA(指定活用団体)ページ
- 内閣府 — 社会的インパクト評価の推進に向けて(社会的インパクト評価検討ワーキング・グループ報告書、2016年3月)
- 内閣府 — 社会的インパクト評価に関する調査研究 報告書一覧
Everything above is free to read.
The rest is for members
This column has moved into the archive, so the full deep-dive is for Urban Farm Crew members and up. Membership funds the daily collection, research and operation of this independent public database. The latest columns are free for everyone.
Or get new columns free by email first
Every Wednesday: a free email digest of new urban-farming cases, research and events from around the world.
Reader feedback
Was this article useful?
No sign-in required. One vote per article on this device; you can change your choice.
Related columns
The gardens came in 1990, the national law in 2024 — a map of six South American countries
In South America the response to crisis came first, municipalities carried it for two decades, and national law arrived last
17 min readGermany among its neighbours — what is actually different from Britain, France and Poland?
Allotments are no German monopoly. What differs is not the number of plots but the rent cap, the closed list of termination grounds and the legal standing of the association
19 min readA Munich foundation that links 1,000 gardens — anstiftung and the network of self-making
Who keeps the gardens that no law protects?
18 min read1.5 million in the East, a 1983 law in the West — the two gardens that division made
In the East an organisation kept the gardens; in the West a statute did. What unification left standing was the statute, plus a set of exemptions written for the East
18 min read